TARSU, PURIFICATION, SEWER, WATER .... ORGANIZED AND CITIZENS 'BEST!
After a period of suspension of publications and a partial correction of the mission of the study (special attention is given to the many complaints by users against compulsory collection of fees, taxes, fines and recoveries, not related by agencies relevance to public or private regime almost) back with a series of articles and news for users and citizens, especially in this time of crisis, felt the need for greater protection of their rights at all levels, both public and private sectors. Reclamation sarnese Agro Nocerino, Fee for the purification and sewage, road tax, Tarsu, ICI, Gas, Water, fines etc.. become a true and his nightmare for families and especially for the elderly, when these services are entrusted to municipal bodies to participate (often limited company with the participation of interested private profit rather than to the efficiency of the service, or to facilitate nepotistic hiring outside the government) is not prepared for an efficient and effective management of the service. Appeals in Tax Commission, claims self-defense to the management authorities, appeals to the justice of the peace, included as part of wider action to protect the citizen, that cross a greater awareness seems to be aware of the need for more organized forms collaboration (such as committees, associations and working groups), they can certainly ensure a more effective protection of the rights violated. Important in this respect the latest rulings of the Supreme Court or the Constitutional Court on the subject, that are creating clarity on certain aspects of the rates which for various reasons these institutions apply to citizens-users (often illegal as containing illegal entries or not due) .
Attorney Michael Anthony Giliberti
TARSU NOT THE 'SUBJECT TO VAT
The fee for disposal of municipal solid waste, is the tribute that the municipalities applied on basis of the total cost of the service collection and subsequent disposal of waste using as parameter the surface of the living quarters and activities where the waste may arise.
With a recent ruling, the Court of Cassation ruled chel'IVA 10% normally charged on the bills of the waste tax is unlawful. The Court of Cassation, in line with the approach of other European Union countries, has determined that the consideration that citizens must pay for the collection and disposal of waste, is a tax and not a fee is not charged and therefore the 'VAT.
This important decision means the ability for taxpayers to request the refund to the municipalities levying of the sums paid by way of value added tax (VAT) on the fee for waste disposal in the last ten years.
Appeals
and VAT refund in hand with proof of payment in the last ten years of Tarsu on which the entry was calculated at 10% VAT, you may ask for a refund. Initially it is sufficient, even with the help of a lawyer, wary that the municipal government performance.
With a recent ruling, the Court of Cassation ruled chel'IVA 10% normally charged on the bills of the waste tax is unlawful. The Court of Cassation, in line with the approach of other European Union countries, has determined that the consideration that citizens must pay for the collection and disposal of waste, is a tax and not a fee is not charged and therefore the 'VAT.
This important decision means the ability for taxpayers to request the refund to the municipalities levying of the sums paid by way of value added tax (VAT) on the fee for waste disposal in the last ten years.
Appeals
and VAT refund in hand with proof of payment in the last ten years of Tarsu on which the entry was calculated at 10% VAT, you may ask for a refund. Initially it is sufficient, even with the help of a lawyer, wary that the municipal government performance.
0 comments:
Post a Comment